Skip to main content

Actions that might help fighting climate change

As an Earth science researcher, I talk a lot about climate change. But most of time I was basically sending message stating that climate change is real and bad. I didn't spend much time thinking and explaining what should we do to battle climate change.

Certainly we can slow down our pace in terms of civilization developments, which will slow down climate change maybe. For example, if we slow down the rate population moving from rural area to urban area, it helps because it is likely to decrease emission.

There are many thing we should slow down:

  1. Stop building big cities
  2. Stop building highway
  3. Stop building houses, especially in natural system
  4. Reduce meat consumption
  5. Slow down vehicle production
  6. Reduce ocean exploration
  7. Stop using non renewable energy
All above could fight climate change, to some extent. But that is not enough because it is only slowing the trend down.

Something else we should do to reverse the engine
  1. Plant more trees for sure.
  2. Remove highway and build high speed trains
  3. Remove agriculture land and restore the forest
  4. Protect ecosystem diversity
As an individual, what we can do?
  1. Plant trees around your house
  2. If you have a large house in the forest, maybe you should consider change it to a smaller one
  3. Eat less meat
  4. Take public transportation more and drive less
  5. Do not waste water and electricity
  6. Do not litter
  7. Cook instead of drive through
  8. Buy electronic vehicle
They are also organizations and companies we should put them accountable or require adjustments:
  1. Gas and coal company even though life still depends upon them, but they need to evolve
  2. Company that ignore environmental consequences, such as Microsoft put data center in deep ocean to cool down server
We should also adopt a minimalist lifestyle: we only take what it's needed, nothing more.
The less we take from Earth and the less disturbance, the more sustainable it could be.


Popular posts from this blog

Spatial datasets operations: mask raster using region of interest

Climate change related studies usually involve spatial datasets extraction from a larger domain.
In this article, I will briefly discuss some potential issues and solutions.

In the most common scenario, we need to extract a raster file using a polygon based shapefile. And I will focus as an example.

In a typical desktop application such as ArcMap or ENVI, this is usually done with a tool called clip or extract using mask or ROI.

Before any analysis can be done, it is the best practice to project all datasets into the same projection.

If you are lucky enough, you may find that the polygon you will use actually matches up with the raster grid perfectly. But it rarely happens unless you created the shapefile using "fishnet" or other approaches.

What if luck is not with you? The algorithm within these tool usually will make the best estimate of the value based on the location. The nearest re-sample, but not limited to, will be used to calculate the value. But what about the outp…

Numerical simulation: ode/pde solver and spin-up

For Earth Science model development, I inevitably have to deal with ODE and PDE equations. I also have come across some discussion related to this topic, i.e.,

In an attempt to answer this question, as well as redefine the problem I am dealing with, I decided to organize some materials to illustrate our current state on this topic.

Models are essentially equations. In Earth Science, these equations are usually ODE or PDE. So I want to discuss this from a mathematical perspective.

Ideally, we want to solve these ODE/PDE with initial condition (IC) and boundary condition (BC) using various numerical methods.

Because of the nature of geology, everything is similar to its neighbors. So we can construct a system of equations which may have multiple equation for each single grid cell. Now we have an array of equation…

Lessons I have learnt during E3SM development

I have been involved with the E3SM development since I joined PNNL as a postdoc. Over the course of time, I have learnt a lot from the E3SM model. I also found many issues within the model, which reflects lots of similar struggles in the lifespan of software engineering.

Here I list a few major ones that we all dislike but they are around in almost every project we have worked on.

Excessive usage of existing framework even it is not meant to Working in a large project means that you should NOT re-invent the wheels if they are already there. But more often, developers tend to use existing data types and functions even when they were not designed to do so. The reason is simple: it is easier to use existing ones than to create new ones. For example, in E3SM, there was not a data type to transfer data between river and land. Instead, developers use the data type designed for atmosphere and land to do the job. While it is ok to do so, it added unnecessary confusion for future development a…