Skip to main content

Some thoughts on respiration and the role of microbe

I was recently upgrading some components within the ECO3D model, specifically the carbon pool and fluxes in vegetation, litter and soil.

The overall scheme of these components are illustrated in Figure 1:
Figure 1. The carbon pool and flux.

While it is well-known that the incoming carbon flux is mainly from photosynthesis process, which is also been well studied, the challenge is the outgoing carbon flux.

Without considering wildfire, etc., disturbance, "respiration" is generally considered the major pathway through which carbon is released back into the atmosphere. However, for individual site, horizontal carbon flux (DOC and DIC, etc.) is also important but it only services as a transport pathway.

In most terrestrial ecosystem modeling, respiration is broken into autotrophic respiration and heterotrophic respiration (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Respiration in terrestrial ecosystem.
Fundamentally, respiration is a biological and biochemical process occurs in cellular level. And it is assumed to convert organic component to energy, which the opposite process of photosynthesis.

In different fields, these processes are often labeled "soil respiration", "decomposition", "mineralization" and "immobilization", etc., which causes lots of confusion for researchers from different background.

Here I am trying to identify the major pathway and difference between these processes.

First, though respiration occurs at cellular level, we need to understand where these cells are located. For autotrophic respiration, which is usually consisted of maintenance respiration and growth respiration throughout the vegetation, it takes places within the vegetation canopy, stem and root. And the rate of respiration is controlled by the nutrient availability within vegetation and climate factors.

For heterotrophic respiration, it usually takes place within microbe, which uses this process to obtain energy. Along with this process, large organic carbon molecular maybe decomposed into small molecular and carbon dioxide/water will be produced. In another word, this respiration process is linked with decomposition process. In some cases, small inorganic carbon may be produced and the respiration is also coupled with the so called "mineralization".

As a result, heterotrophic respiration is always linked with decomposition and mineralization but they are not exchangeable because they all have different focus under different context. For example, when litter is decomposed in the early stage due to physical process such as heat, it is generally not considered as respiration or mineralization. 

Because of its dependency of microbe activity on temperature, these processes are often modeled using a Q10 function. However, care must be taken to consider the board definition of decomposition and other factors. Other than that, when modeling these processes, we must make sure they share the same characteristics because they are possibly taking place within the same cellular level.


Popular posts from this blog

Spatial datasets operations: mask raster using region of interest

Climate change related studies usually involve spatial datasets extraction from a larger domain.
In this article, I will briefly discuss some potential issues and solutions.

In the most common scenario, we need to extract a raster file using a polygon based shapefile. And I will focus as an example.

In a typical desktop application such as ArcMap or ENVI, this is usually done with a tool called clip or extract using mask or ROI.

Before any analysis can be done, it is the best practice to project all datasets into the same projection.

If you are lucky enough, you may find that the polygon you will use actually matches up with the raster grid perfectly. But it rarely happens unless you created the shapefile using "fishnet" or other approaches.

What if luck is not with you? The algorithm within these tool usually will make the best estimate of the value based on the location. The nearest re-sample, but not limited to, will be used to calculate the value. But what about the outp…

Numerical simulation: ode/pde solver and spin-up

For Earth Science model development, I inevitably have to deal with ODE and PDE equations. I also have come across some discussion related to this topic, i.e.,

In an attempt to answer this question, as well as redefine the problem I am dealing with, I decided to organize some materials to illustrate our current state on this topic.

Models are essentially equations. In Earth Science, these equations are usually ODE or PDE. So I want to discuss this from a mathematical perspective.

Ideally, we want to solve these ODE/PDE with initial condition (IC) and boundary condition (BC) using various numerical methods.

Because of the nature of geology, everything is similar to its neighbors. So we can construct a system of equations which may have multiple equation for each single grid cell. Now we have an array of equation…

Lessons I have learnt during E3SM development

I have been involved with the E3SM development since I joined PNNL as a postdoc. Over the course of time, I have learnt a lot from the E3SM model. I also found many issues within the model, which reflects lots of similar struggles in the lifespan of software engineering.

Here I list a few major ones that we all dislike but they are around in almost every project we have worked on.

Excessive usage of existing framework even it is not meant to Working in a large project means that you should NOT re-invent the wheels if they are already there. But more often, developers tend to use existing data types and functions even when they were not designed to do so. The reason is simple: it is easier to use existing ones than to create new ones. For example, in E3SM, there was not a data type to transfer data between river and land. Instead, developers use the data type designed for atmosphere and land to do the job. While it is ok to do so, it added unnecessary confusion for future development a…