Skip to main content

Spatial datasets operations: an overview of global climate dataset and interpolation

Climate dataset is literally the most important data in climate change research. Great efforts have been made to prepare climate dataset over the decades.

In my recent project, I need to prepare some climate dataset at global scale. Then I have to take some time to finish a review of current state of climate dataset at global scale.

First, I want to emphasize "global scale" including both arctic and antarctic. Because I will use this data in a three-dimensional ecosystem simulation, a special configuration of the data structure will be used, which is completely different from traditional approaches.

Second, where or how can we get the climate data?

The easiest source we can turn to is existing global climate dataset, such as CRU dataset, NCEP dataset. I try not to get into details of these data but rather list the source and state some critical aspects that we have to take into consideration.

CRU:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/data
http://www.ipcc-data.org/observ/clim/cru_climatologies.html
NCEP:
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/reanalysis/reanalysis.shtml
ECMWF
https://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/climate-reanalysis
WorldClim
http://www.worldclim.org/

Pros:
  • Easy to use
  • Global coverage

Cons:
  • Missing polar regions
  • Coarse resolution


Based on meteorology site observations, many spatial interpolation methods can also be used to produce spatial dataset.
IDW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_distance_weighting
Kriging
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriging

Pros:
  • Easy to implement

Cons:
  • Data not well distributed
  • Algorithm uncertainty


There are also advanced tools can be used to prepare climate data.
ANUSPLIN
http://fennerschool.anu.edu.au/research/products/anusplin-vrsn-44
PRISM
http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/

Pros:

  • Could potential on global scale


Cons:
  • Computational demand
  • Hard to implement 

Recently, Artificial Neural Network has also been used for spatial interpolation. But current tests show that ANN may not be as good as traditional approaches.

Pros:
  • Easy to use

Cons:
  • Uncertainty

I want to highlight that our use of latitude/longitude in spatial resolution will cause issues in polar regions. This is because of the underlying mathematics definition of latitude/longitude. There are a few solutions to this issue but that is currently out of the scope in this post. I will provide some hint here that may be used to address this issue.
http://www.discreteglobalgrids.org/

So what could potentially be the best choice?
As for now, I see the potential in ANN since it is nonlinear and could potentially performance well compared with traditional approaches. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spatial datasets operations: mask raster using region of interest

Climate change related studies usually involve spatial datasets extraction from a larger domain.
In this article, I will briefly discuss some potential issues and solutions.

In the most common scenario, we need to extract a raster file using a polygon based shapefile. And I will focus as an example.

In a typical desktop application such as ArcMap or ENVI, this is usually done with a tool called clip or extract using mask or ROI.

Before any analysis can be done, it is the best practice to project all datasets into the same projection.

If you are lucky enough, you may find that the polygon you will use actually matches up with the raster grid perfectly. But it rarely happens unless you created the shapefile using "fishnet" or other approaches.

What if luck is not with you? The algorithm within these tool usually will make the best estimate of the value based on the location. The nearest re-sample, but not limited to, will be used to calculate the value. But what about the outp…

Numerical simulation: ode/pde solver and spin-up

For Earth Science model development, I inevitably have to deal with ODE and PDE equations. I also have come across some discussion related to this topic, i.e.,

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_does_one_mean_by_Model_Spin_Up_Time

In an attempt to answer this question, as well as redefine the problem I am dealing with, I decided to organize some materials to illustrate our current state on this topic.

Models are essentially equations. In Earth Science, these equations are usually ODE or PDE. So I want to discuss this from a mathematical perspective.

Ideally, we want to solve these ODE/PDE with initial condition (IC) and boundary condition (BC) using various numerical methods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_value_problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_value_problem

Because of the nature of geology, everything is similar to its neighbors. So we can construct a system of equations which may have multiple equation for each single grid cell. Now we have an array of equation…

Watershed Delineation On A Hexagonal Mesh Grid: Part A

One of our recent publications is "Watershed Delineation On A Hexagonal Mesh Grid" published on Environmental Modeling and Software (link).
Here I want to provide some behind the scene details of this study.

(The figures are high resolution, you might need to zoom in to view.)

First, I'd like to introduce the motivation of this work. Many of us including me have done lots of watershed/catchment hydrology modeling. For example, one of my recent publications is a three-dimensional carbon-water cycle modeling work (link), which uses lots of watershed hydrology algorithms.
In principle, watershed hydrology should be applied to large spatial domain, even global scale. But why no one is doing it?  I will use the popular USDA SWAT model as an example. Why no one is setting up a SWAT model globally? 
There are several reasons we cannot use SWAT at global scale: We cannot produce a global DEM with a desired map projection. SWAT model relies on stream network, which depends on DEM.…