Skip to main content

Ecosystem modeling: challenges in simulating the dissolved organic carbon

Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) is an important carbon budget within ecosystem, especially for aquatic ecosystem including oceanic ecosystem.

Conventional DOC investigations mainly focus on DOC measurements in either soil profile or stream discharge. These measurements generally cannot explain where does DOC come from and how much DOC will be exported into the ocean. However, these studies have provided much insights of what biogeochemical processes are responsible for DOC dynamics.

So the question is can we quantitatively estimate DOC in terrestrial ecosystem based on existing knowledge.

I will provide more information on this topic in the coming months.

There are a few processes need to be simulated following the path of DOC.

  1. DOC production, consumption, and transportation on surface (mainly in litter);
  2. DOC production, consumption and transportation in subsurface (mainly in soil);
  3. DOC consumption and transportation in hydrological network;
  4. In some scenarios, DOC transportation in groundwater movements.

For section 3, there are some widely established approach to simulate solute transportation in stream. For example, the MT3D-USGS provides the one-dimensional advection-dispersion equation to solve the transport in stream network.

Assuming we have a fully distributed watershed hydrology model, each stream segment is represented by a number of stream reaches.

In order to estimate DOC transport in each stream reach, we need an accurate estimate of stream flow and associated DOC concentration. Three or four type of flow play a role in this process.

  1. Over land surface runoff
  2. Soil zone inter flow
  3. Open channel flow
  4. Potential groundwater flow
These flow may have completely different type of proprieties including flow rate and travel time. 

And the spatial resolution also plays an important role since all time related processes must be linked to grid size.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spatial datasets operations: mask raster using region of interest

Climate change related studies usually involve spatial datasets extraction from a larger domain.
In this article, I will briefly discuss some potential issues and solutions.

In the most common scenario, we need to extract a raster file using a polygon based shapefile. And I will focus as an example.

In a typical desktop application such as ArcMap or ENVI, this is usually done with a tool called clip or extract using mask or ROI.

Before any analysis can be done, it is the best practice to project all datasets into the same projection.

If you are lucky enough, you may find that the polygon you will use actually matches up with the raster grid perfectly. But it rarely happens unless you created the shapefile using "fishnet" or other approaches.

What if luck is not with you? The algorithm within these tool usually will make the best estimate of the value based on the location. The nearest re-sample, but not limited to, will be used to calculate the value. But what about the outp…

Numerical simulation: ode/pde solver and spin-up

For Earth Science model development, I inevitably have to deal with ODE and PDE equations. I also have come across some discussion related to this topic, i.e.,

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_does_one_mean_by_Model_Spin_Up_Time

In an attempt to answer this question, as well as redefine the problem I am dealing with, I decided to organize some materials to illustrate our current state on this topic.

Models are essentially equations. In Earth Science, these equations are usually ODE or PDE. So I want to discuss this from a mathematical perspective.

Ideally, we want to solve these ODE/PDE with initial condition (IC) and boundary condition (BC) using various numerical methods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_value_problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_value_problem

Because of the nature of geology, everything is similar to its neighbors. So we can construct a system of equations which may have multiple equation for each single grid cell. Now we have an array of equation…

Lessons I have learnt during E3SM development

I have been involved with the E3SM development since I joined PNNL as a postdoc. Over the course of time, I have learnt a lot from the E3SM model. I also found many issues within the model, which reflects lots of similar struggles in the lifespan of software engineering.

Here I list a few major ones that we all dislike but they are around in almost every project we have worked on.

Excessive usage of existing framework even it is not meant to Working in a large project means that you should NOT re-invent the wheels if they are already there. But more often, developers tend to use existing data types and functions even when they were not designed to do so. The reason is simple: it is easier to use existing ones than to create new ones. For example, in E3SM, there was not a data type to transfer data between river and land. Instead, developers use the data type designed for atmosphere and land to do the job. While it is ok to do so, it added unnecessary confusion for future development a…