Skip to main content

Surface water hydrology modeling: scaling issue in Precipitation Runoff Modeling System(PRMS)

Grid-based HRU network for stream routing in PRMS could be convenient for several reasons.
Apparently the ideal data structure as matrix could be one of them.But it is not always the case if the scaling issue is not well handled.
Below is an example how the scale issue could be a potential problem for the simulation framework.
First, I would like to introduce the CRT. Cascade Routing Tool (CRT) is a computer application for watershed models that include the coupled Groundwater and Surface-water FLOW model GSFLOW and the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS). More information could be found at (
The example run result is listed as:
Read the instruction of CRT and you will easily understand the legend/label of the above result.The stream line datasets used here is vector and the grid resolutions in horizontal are both 100 meters.
The next step, the subbasin was delineated using stream line and DEM datasets. Note that in these operations, the resolution of DEM is 10 meters instead of 100 meters. The result is as follow:

We are already able to see the potential problem in the above result. The stream line may lies in one grid but the majority of that grid contribute to another subbasin. Could that be a problem? Then, in order to determine which HRU or grid contribute to which stream segment, the rasterization operation is conducted on the subbasin feature, which is the result from watershed delineation.
We have:

The algorithm of rasterization most likely classify grids based on area. And therefore the stream line would cut into neighbors in some cases.
As a result, one HRU must be 8-neighbor connected instead of 4 if the subbasin is inter connected, which is not true for CRT algorithm.
So what is the most practical and robust method to address this problem?


Popular posts from this blog

Spatial datasets operations: mask raster using region of interest

Climate change related studies usually involve spatial datasets extraction from a larger domain.
In this article, I will briefly discuss some potential issues and solutions.

In the most common scenario, we need to extract a raster file using a polygon based shapefile. And I will focus as an example.

In a typical desktop application such as ArcMap or ENVI, this is usually done with a tool called clip or extract using mask or ROI.

Before any analysis can be done, it is the best practice to project all datasets into the same projection.

If you are lucky enough, you may find that the polygon you will use actually matches up with the raster grid perfectly. But it rarely happens unless you created the shapefile using "fishnet" or other approaches.

What if luck is not with you? The algorithm within these tool usually will make the best estimate of the value based on the location. The nearest re-sample, but not limited to, will be used to calculate the value. But what about the outp…

Numerical simulation: ode/pde solver and spin-up

For Earth Science model development, I inevitably have to deal with ODE and PDE equations. I also have come across some discussion related to this topic, i.e.,

In an attempt to answer this question, as well as redefine the problem I am dealing with, I decided to organize some materials to illustrate our current state on this topic.

Models are essentially equations. In Earth Science, these equations are usually ODE or PDE. So I want to discuss this from a mathematical perspective.

Ideally, we want to solve these ODE/PDE with initial condition (IC) and boundary condition (BC) using various numerical methods.

Because of the nature of geology, everything is similar to its neighbors. So we can construct a system of equations which may have multiple equation for each single grid cell. Now we have an array of equation…

Watershed Delineation On A Hexagonal Mesh Grid: Part A

One of our recent publications is "Watershed Delineation On A Hexagonal Mesh Grid" published on Environmental Modeling and Software (link).
Here I want to provide some behind the scene details of this study.

(The figures are high resolution, you might need to zoom in to view.)

First, I'd like to introduce the motivation of this work. Many of us including me have done lots of watershed/catchment hydrology modeling. For example, one of my recent publications is a three-dimensional carbon-water cycle modeling work (link), which uses lots of watershed hydrology algorithms.
In principle, watershed hydrology should be applied to large spatial domain, even global scale. But why no one is doing it?  I will use the popular USDA SWAT model as an example. Why no one is setting up a SWAT model globally? 
There are several reasons we cannot use SWAT at global scale: We cannot produce a global DEM with a desired map projection. SWAT model relies on stream network, which depends on DEM.…