Skip to main content

Parameter estimation: data format in model I/O

Parameter estimation, also referred as model calibration, usually involves with model simulations with different sets of data and parameters.

A common practice is to replace the parameter within model inputs with different values and calculate the minimum objective function, which is used in PEST.

Most of the time, parameter estimation can be very computational. Therefore, a better data format can reduce I/O burden and improve the efficiency.

A typical example is as follows:

To calibrate the groundwater modeling such as MODFLOW, a few template files much be prepared for PEST package. Since PEST requires that all ASCII file must NOT exceed 2000 in width. This means that all the template files must be written with care.
For simulations with large spatial domains, the input files are usually large as well. And it is very important to keep the data format well designed that the accuracy and efficiency could be compromised.

On the other hand, PEST also reads the output from model simulation. It is also important to design an efficient format for the instruction file.

Further analysis of these types of data requires other scripts for I/O, especially when encountered with binary data.

So, the general guidelines would as follows:

  1. Use special characters (white space) to separate individual data values whenever possible for inputs;
  2. Use fixed format for model output;
  3. Use exponent scientific format when values are large or small;
  4. Avoid unnecessary space when possible;
  5. Use advanced format such as binary if possible.
I will provide a real-life format example for MODFLOW simulation later.
Comments are welcome.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spatial datasets operations: mask raster using region of interest

Climate change related studies usually involve spatial datasets extraction from a larger domain.
In this article, I will briefly discuss some potential issues and solutions.

In the most common scenario, we need to extract a raster file using a polygon based shapefile. And I will focus as an example.

In a typical desktop application such as ArcMap or ENVI, this is usually done with a tool called clip or extract using mask or ROI.

Before any analysis can be done, it is the best practice to project all datasets into the same projection.

If you are lucky enough, you may find that the polygon you will use actually matches up with the raster grid perfectly. But it rarely happens unless you created the shapefile using "fishnet" or other approaches.

What if luck is not with you? The algorithm within these tool usually will make the best estimate of the value based on the location. The nearest re-sample, but not limited to, will be used to calculate the value. But what about the outp…

Numerical simulation: ode/pde solver and spin-up

For Earth Science model development, I inevitably have to deal with ODE and PDE equations. I also have come across some discussion related to this topic, i.e.,

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_does_one_mean_by_Model_Spin_Up_Time

In an attempt to answer this question, as well as redefine the problem I am dealing with, I decided to organize some materials to illustrate our current state on this topic.

Models are essentially equations. In Earth Science, these equations are usually ODE or PDE. So I want to discuss this from a mathematical perspective.

Ideally, we want to solve these ODE/PDE with initial condition (IC) and boundary condition (BC) using various numerical methods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_value_problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_value_problem

Because of the nature of geology, everything is similar to its neighbors. So we can construct a system of equations which may have multiple equation for each single grid cell. Now we have an array of equation…

Lessons I have learnt during E3SM development

I have been involved with the E3SM development since I joined PNNL as a postdoc. Over the course of time, I have learnt a lot from the E3SM model. I also found many issues within the model, which reflects lots of similar struggles in the lifespan of software engineering.

Here I list a few major ones that we all dislike but they are around in almost every project we have worked on.

Excessive usage of existing framework even it is not meant to Working in a large project means that you should NOT re-invent the wheels if they are already there. But more often, developers tend to use existing data types and functions even when they were not designed to do so. The reason is simple: it is easier to use existing ones than to create new ones. For example, in E3SM, there was not a data type to transfer data between river and land. Instead, developers use the data type designed for atmosphere and land to do the job. While it is ok to do so, it added unnecessary confusion for future development a…